Flying Horseshoes Newsletter
Official publication of the Clinton County Horseshoe Club in Frankfort, Indiana
President Sam Payne * Vice
President Frank Adams *
Secretary-Treasurer Kenny Wolf
edited by Kenny Wolf
www.kennywolf.com/curtday.htm
Issue #2, June 2005
Horseshoe Pitching Handicaps: What Are They, How Are They Figured
and How Do They Work?
What Are They?
At the Curt Day Horseshoe Courts, we play games of 30 shoes with two
men on a team. The highest possible score is 90 points per man if
a perfect game is thrown with 30 straight ringers worth 3 points
each. So one pitcher can score anywhere from 0 points to 90
points. If a pitcher who averages 15 points per game pitches
against a pitcher who averages 45 points per game, it is not much of a
contest without adding handicaps to their scores when they compete
against each other. There is a scoring average in every handicap
system known as “scratch”. Scratch is the score that gets no
handicap. Many times a scratch score is arrived at by taking the
average of the best pitcher in the league. When 50 shoes were
thrown, the Clinton County Horseshoe Club used 120 points. The 30
shoes scratch score equivalent to 120 points for 50 shoes is 72
points. Therefore, scratch for our league is 72 points.
Anyone with a 72 or higher average has a 0 handicap.
When a pitcher with a 15 average pitches against a pitcher with a 45
average, the 15 pitcher uses a handicap of 51 (see chart on the back)
added to his final score for the game. If he pitches his average
game, he will have 66 points total (15 + 51). The 45 pitcher uses
a handicap of 24 added to his final score. If he pitches his
average game, he will have 69 points. On an average night, the
more skilled pitcher will win against a less skilled or beginner
pitcher by only a few points, if they both pitch their
average. If the higher average pitcher pitches a few points below
his average on a given night and the lower average pitcher pitches a
few points above his average, then the pitcher who pitched above his
average wins.
The handicap system was designed to force pitchers
to pitch their averages or better, in order to win games
consistently. It allows real competition between horseshoe
pitchers of different skill levels in the game. It allows mixed
doubles and team play which does favor the two pitchers with the
combined higher average, but only if they pitch their averages or
better and only if the other pitchers do not pitch games quite a bit
over their averages.
How Are They Figured?
Why does a pitcher’s total points with his average of 45 and his
handicap of 24 add up to 69 points and a pitcher’s total points with
his average of 15 and his handicap of 51 only add up to 66 points; or 3
points less than the higher average pitcher? It is the percent of
difference factor used to arrive at handicaps. A handicap is
figured by taking the “scratch” points total (in our league it is 72
points), subtract the pitcher’s average from this number (in this case
it would be 72 – 45 = 27). However, most handicapping systems do
not give the total difference to the participant as their
handicap. Our league gives 90% of the difference. In other
words. 90% of 27 is 24 (fractions are dropped); or a handicap of 24 for
an average of 51 points. The chart on the back of this newsletter
shows the handicaps for averages of 12 through 71, with 72 receiving no
handicap.
How Do They Work?
Does it really mean anything when a less skilled pitcher beats a higher
skilled pitcher using the handicap system? It sure does, because
that is how the system works. It means the guy with the lower
average out-pitched the higher average pitcher in the sense that he
exceeded his own pitching average and had a “good game” for him and the
other guy failed to accomplish his own average and had a “bad
game” for him.
The handicap system is a brilliant scoring system of measuring and
rewarding improvement at all levels of the game and it equalizes the
playing field . . . “so to speak”.
With the dynamics of two man team play and the combined averages and
handicaps of each pitcher is added together with one pitcher having an
off night and the other pitcher pitching well versus two pitchers with
lower averages and higher handicaps, or some other mixture, yields a
very interesting contest of horseshoe pitching. Add to that
the natural instinct of horseshoe pitchers to encourage their own
opponents in their efforts to do their best, even at the cost of a game
or the nightly series of games, and you have some interesting and
enjoyable nights of fellowship with like-minded folks.
In effect the handicap system does not necessarily reward only those
who are better, but it mostly rewards those who are getting
better. Wow, what a concept! A system that favors those
individuals who show improvement over their “average”, rather than a
system that only rewards those who are the best. But the check
factor to keep the handicap system from working totally against those
who happen to have achieved excellence through hours of practice and
play; with skills that they developed over time through the love of the
game is the “percent of the difference factor” that each league uses
for its handicap computations. As stated earlier and as the chart
above and on the front page show, the Clinton County Horseshoe Pitchers
Association and other leagues use a handicap system with a scratch of
72 points and 90% of the difference between a pitcher’s average and 72
points. 80% to 85% of the difference would favor the more skilled
pitchers, while 100% of the difference would be so favorable to the
beginners and those with lower averages, that they would have
absolutely no incentive to improve their own averages over time in
order to get a higher point total when adding their average onto their
handicaps. We find that the scratch 72 with 90% difference system
achieves all the things we wish to achieve in creating an environment
for good competitive league play, encouraging pitchers to improve their
own games to raise their average plus handicaps total points and keep
an atmosphere where we can continue to encourage one another in a
spirit of friendship and camaraderie.
In the actual calculating of handicaps, the club statistician may round
off averages or drop any fractions, before determining the current
handicap; or he may do all his calculations with fractions and then
round off or drop the fractions to determine the handicap.
He figures everyone the same way. The charts on this paper show
handicaps and averages with fractions dropped off to show only the
integer.
We pitch teams of two men against two other men for three 30 shoe games
with one point in the standings going to the winner of each game
(scores plus handicaps). We also award one point to the team that
pitches the higher total points (scores plus handicaps) in the evening
“series.” If one team wins all three games, then their series
total points will also be the higher and they would be awarded four
points for the evening’s match. It is possible for one team to
win two games, but lose a third game by so much that the other team
wins one point for one game and one point for the series total points.
Player's Avg. Pts. 30 Shoes * Player's Handicap 30 Shoes * Total Points
(1st column is score; 2nd column is handicap; 3rd column is total points with handicap)
| 71 | 0
| 72 | 51 | 18 | 69 | 31 | 36 | 67 | 11 | 54 | 65 |
| 70 | 1
| 71 | 50 | 19 | 69 | 30 | 37 | 67 | 10 | 55 | 65 |
| 69 | 2 | 71 | 49 | 20 | 69 | 29 | 38 | 67 | 9 | 56 | 65 |
| 68 | 3 | 71 | 48 | 21 | 69 | 28 | 39 | 67 | 8 | 57 | 65 |
| 67 | 4 | 71 | 47 | 22 | 69 | 27 | 40 | 67 | 7 | 58 | 65 |
| 66 | 5 | 71 | 46 | 23 | 69 | 26 | 41 | 67 | 6 | 59 | 65 |
| 65 | 6 | 71 | 45 | 24 | 69 | 25 | 42 | 67 | 5 | 60 | 65 |
| 64 | 7 | 71 | 44 | 25 | 69 | 24 | 43 | 67 | 4 | 61 | 65 |
| 63 | 8 | 71 | 43 | 26 | 69 | 23 | 44 | 67 | 3 | 62 | 65 |
| 62 | 9 | 71 | 42 | 27 | 69 | 22 | 45 | 67 | 2 | 63 | 65 |
| 61 | 9 | 70 | 41 | 27 | 68 | 21 | 45 | 66 | 1 | 63 | 64 |
| 60 | 10 | 70 | 40 | 28 | 68 | 20 | 46 | 66 | 0 | 64 | 64 |
| 59 | 11 | 70 | 39 | 29 | 68 | 19 | 47 | 66 |
| 58 | 12 | 70 | 38 | 30 | 68 | 18 | 48 | 66 |
| 57 | 13 | 70 | 37 | 31 | 68 | 17 | 49 | 66 |
| 56 | 14 | 70 | 36 | 32 | 68 | 16 | 50 | 66 |
| 55 | 15 | 70 | 35 | 33 | 68 | 15 | 51 | 66 |
| 54 | 16 | 70 | 34 | 34 | 68 | 14 | 52 | 66 |
| 53 | 17 | 70 | 33 | 35 | 68 | 13 | 53 | 66 |
| 52 | 18 | 70 | 32 | 36 | 68 | 12 | 54 | 66 |
Return to Flying Horseshoes Newsletter Contents Page